DÜSSELDORF, Germany (March 9, 2026) — Fender Musical Instruments Corporation (FMIC) has secured a significant legal victory following a ruling by the Regional Court of Düsseldorf that establishes broad legal protection for Fender’s iconic Stratocaster® guitar body design under German and European copyright law.
The court's decision creates enforceable rights against any guitars using the Stratocaster body shape that are manufactured, sold or distributed into Germany or other countries of the European Union (EU), regardless of where those guitars are produced - reinforcing Fender’s ability to protect its designs in global commerce.
On further review of this matter, it was a default judgement as the Chinese company did not show up to the hearing. As a result of the ruling against, Yiwu Philharmonic Musical Instruments Co, a drop-ship manufacturer is as follows:
They are prohibited from manufacturing, offering, or distributing guitars featuring the Stratocaster® body shape in Germany and the EU. Any future violations may result in fines of up to €250,000 per infringement, or up to six months’ imprisonment if fines cannot be enforced, subject to statutory limits.
“This ruling is a meaningful affirmation of the Stratocaster® as an original creative work and an important step in continuing to protect the integrity of Fender’s designs and intellectual property,” said Aarash Darroodi, General Counsel & Chief Administrative Officer Fender Musical Instruments Corporation.
“It reinforces our commitment to originality, supports fair competition, and helps ensure that when players encounter these iconic Fender guitar shapes, they can trust the craftsmanship, quality, and heritage behind them.” This ruling affects Stratocaster style guitars being distributed and sold throughout Europe.
In my opinion, this suit was filed in Europe, and YIWU is an Asian company, which is possibly why they ignored the legal action. Subsequently Fender has assumed the judgement applies worldwide and has taken the action in Europe and the United States to prohibit any manufacture from using the Stratocaster shape on guitars.
Recently, the Fender Musical Instrument Company has mailed “Cease And Desist” letters from Fender’s legal counsel, the London based firm of Bird & Bird. These have been sent to boutique builders such as LSL Instruments of California, AliExpress of Asia and Europe, as well as small independent builders warning them that use of the Stratocaster shaped body is a copywritten work of art,
The letter goes on to say: “It has come to our client’s attention that you are marketing electric guitars under the brand [REDACTED]… instanced by the model [REDACTED]…
“The design of the body of these guitars is nearly identical to the design of the body our client’s ‘Stratocaster’ guitars. They are in particular not less similar to the Stratocaster guitars than the guitars which were subject of the Düsseldorf judgment.
“You are therefore infringing our client’s copyright in the Stratocaster body shape. As a consequence, our client has claims against you to cease and desist from further marketing such guitars, disclosure of information about your sales and marketing, damages, destruction of the infringing products, recall of the infringing products, and reimbursement of our legal fees.”
This news is important enough to be featured recently in the Wall Street Journal.
I’ve researched some facts regarding Fender’s stand. There are three methods of obtaining intellectual property rights: Copyrights, Trademarks, and Patents.
Can a US company claim Copyright protection in Germany for a product that was created in the USA in 1954? Yes, on the basis of an agreement between the German Reich and the United States of America from 1892. This agreement is still in force today and guarantees US citizens in Germany the same copyright protection as German authors.
The court found that protection is measured exclusively according to German law. As Leo Fender died in 1991 and the German term of protection runs for 50 years after the death of the author, the Stratocaster is protected in Germany until at least 2041.
However Leo Fender sold the company on January 5th, 1965. Did the sale include all the copyrights, patents, intellectual property, and trademarks?
The next company Leo Fender was a part of was Music Man. This company made Fender-like amplifiers, and guitars that looked surprisingly like the Stratocaster.
Music Man started in 1971, however Leo Fender could not officially become a partner until March on 1975 when his 10 year non-compete clause expired.
In March 2009, the US Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) ruled that the Stratocaster body shape had become generic. Essentially The body shape is effectively in the public domain.
Fender attempted to trademark the body outlines, but U.S. courts ruled the design is too "generic" and common. As a result, countless manufacturers sell "S-style" guitars. However, the exact "Stratocaster" and "Strat" names remain Fender trademarks.
The decision was the culmination of lengthy legal proceedings that date back to 2003, when Fender initially filed with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office seeking trademark registration for the two-dimensional body shapes for the Strat, Tele, and P-Bass.
Concerned that Fender might be granted the legal right to limit their product offerings, other guitar manufacturers banded together to oppose the application. A suit filed under the heading of Stuart Spector Designs, et al. v. Fender Musical Instruments Corp., was joined by manufacturers Jim Triggs Guitars, JS Technologies, Lakeland Musical Instruments, Levinson Musical Products, Michael Tobias Design, Peavey Electronics, Tom Anderson Guitar Works, Sadowsky Guitars, Saga Musical Instruments, Schecter Guitar Research, ESP Guitars, Tradition Guitars, U.S. Music Corp., Warmoth Guitars, and WD Music Products.
The opposing guitar makers argued that in failing to legally police or protect its body shapes for 50 years, Fender had lost the fight to trademark them.
Ronald Bienstock, senior partner at Bienstock & Michael, who argued the case said, "This case is an important victory for the guitar industry as a whole. The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board has prevented Fender from gaining a monopoly on these body shapes that have been used by hundreds of manufacturers for half a century."
Fender management expressed disappointment with the ruling and is currently considering whether to appeal the decision. "We believed strongly that the evidence supported our arguments," said Bill Mendello, Fender CEO. "We disagree with the conclusions reached by the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board."
One of the plaintiffs in this action, Warmouth Guitars, builds Stratocaster necks and bodies under a licensing agreement with Fender. Currently FMIC is threatening those manufacturers that use the Stratocaster body shape.
I am of the opinion that this all started when some Japanese manufacturers, such as Tokai, were building inexpensive Stratocaster copies in the late 1970's. To counter this Fender entered into a licensing agreement in March of 1982 with Japanese builder FujiGen Gakki to manufacturer guitar in Japan. Later that year Fender used the Squier brand name for their more budget friendly guitars and basses.
In 1985 a group of investors, lead by William Schultz (formerly of Yamaha) purchased the Fender company from CBS. At that time the Fullerton factory was not included in the deal. From 1985 until 1987 Fender instruments were all made in Japan.
While writing this article the law firm Bird and Bird clarified Fender's position that they are not going after every guitar builder that make two horn solid body instruments, only those that are building exact copies of the Stratocaster. This particularly is identified as the PRS Silver Sky model.
It will be interesting to see how this all plays out. Many builders already use a modified Stratocaster body shape on some of their instruments.
©UniqueGuitar Publications (text only) 2026
Click on the links beneath the pictures for sources.
Please click on the advertisements to help support this page. Thanks!
